George Vor
Mobile communications & WLAN in churches
The misuse of church towers as radio towers
Cell phone companies are nothing to envy. On the one hand, they should guarantee a seamless supply, on the other hand, you always have problems finding suitable locations for your transmitters....
The coverage should be as comprehensive as possible, so a high-altitude location is recommended, and citizen protests with the associated delays should be avoided from the outset if possible, so it is advisable to hide the systems "...what the citizen doesn't know, he doesn't do hot…"
In hilly to mountainous terrain, these systems can be placed discreetly on crests in the forest, but what do you do on flat terrain? Transmission masts are very conspicuous and therefore quickly trigger criticism from local residents.
Church towers are in central places and tower over their surroundings, making them an ideal location. And if you then "hide" the transmitters inside, the chances are not that bad that the local residents will not notice what's coming from the church tower.
They then begin to wonder about sleep disorders, lack of concentration and all sorts of other complaints. But then the system is already in place, it is also approved, and that means that those affected have little leverage left to take action against it. With regard to the health problems that occur, one talks oneself out with the arguments of the "official" mouthpieces in politics and authorities, such as the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), that there is no scientific evidence of damage below the legal limit values...
- And the respective parishes can be happy about the rental income, as is well known, they are usually rather short of cash and such a church building also costs a lot of maintenance...
– Do those responsible in the parishes and dioceses actually notice what they are getting themselves into?
They are simply selling the health of their neighbors, community members and their own employees. They let a profit-oriented industry pull them in front of the cart! Especially if they adopt their arguments of belittling, playing down and covering up.
I do not want to go into the discussion on the subject of "harmfulness" any further here, as this would go beyond the scope of this article. There have been meaningful scientific studies for years, the number of which is constantly increasing, pointing to the risks, such as the Naila study, the Reflex study, the NTP study or, more recently, the STOA study.
desecration of churches
And all this just because of the rental income? As if the health of people and nature could be offset against this... - Cell phone use in churches means a desecration of the place of worship, it amounts to a desecration of the place of worship in question!
Basic Christian values versus profit thinking
I have always thought that Christianity is about charity, tolerance and the integration of the weak and disadvantaged.
Those in particular who are responding to increasing levels of electromagnetic pollution from all wireless digital data transmission with increasing ailments, becoming electrosensitive (ES) or even electrohypersensitive (EHS) as a result, could well use the support and advocacy of a strong community like the churches.
These people need advocates, someone to stand up for their rights. It would therefore be very good for the churches here if they stood up for those affected and took up the cause of protecting creation instead of being guided primarily by financial interests.
There is a saying of Jesus:
"What you did to the least of my brothers, you did to me!"
(Matthew 25,40:XNUMX)
Applying this quote to the cell phone situation in churches, one concludes that not only are those affected by EHS being expelled from the church, but Jesus Christ is being expelled from there as well...
This post was created by the Option Community. Join in and post your message!
