George Vor
Latest findings: Ionization by mobile phone radiation due to the pulsing of the signal
As the official bodies never tire of announcing, microwaves and thus mobile phone radiation are in the "non-ionizing" part of the electromagnetic frequency spectrum. Then again and again it is claimed that this radiation has far too little energy to tear electrons out of their original position, such as X-rays or UV radiation. Therefore it is harmless and at best only a warming effect could occur...
But how do you explain the proven biological effects far below this thermal threshold and the resulting damage from which more and more people are suffering? What are the other mechanisms of action of electromagnetic fields on biological systems that the "official" bodies are only too happy to ignore?
Here is an overview of the relevant physical factors:
1. Magnetic field
So one must not only consider the “electrical” part of the electromagnetic wave, but also the “magnetic” part! This, in turn, can very well induce currents in the body that do not belong there. In addition, the magnetic field as the cause, in contrast to the electric field, penetrates every material, including the human body.
2. Resonanz
Especially in the microwave range, many molecules of cell biology resonate with certain base frequencies of mobile communications due to their size or structure. This can very well lead to reactions of these molecules to the radiation, by increasing or changing the natural vibration of these molecules.
3. Polarization
Natural electromagnetic fields are NOT polarized, but artificial ones are! In the case of technically generated EMF, the wave-shaped electric field and the associated magnetic field are perpendicular to each other. This causes interference, resulting in an increase in their intensity. This in turn increases the overlay stress on the cells.
4. Pulsing
It is precisely the pulsing of the signal that is responsible for many problems. The steeper the edge of the pulsed signal, the stronger the effect of the pulsing! The fact that the frequency of the pulsing is often in the range of "biological" vibrations is important here. The digital pulsing does not create a "harmonic" sine wave, but a "disharmonic" square wave.
AND IT IONIZES...
And it is precisely in the interaction of all these frequencies and modulations that the problem lies:
Researchers subjected the mobile phone radiation signal to a mathematical analysis according to Fourier and came to the conclusion when the signal was mathematically broken down that this resulted in both a non-ionizing component in the microwave frequency range and an ionizing component in the UV frequency range -Radiation and higher comes.
And the steeper the flanks of the pulsation, the higher the ionizing component!
And it is precisely this ionizing part that can move electrons and thus causes DNA damage, tumors, oxidative stress, etc., like X-rays or UV radiation.
...That means nothing else than that ionizing maximum frequencies, like stowaways, are given unnoticed by pulsing a non-ionizing carrier frequency...
This phenomenon can be understood very practically in "small":
You take a broadband measuring device for high frequency and try to measure the radiation of the normal power grid with it - nothing usually happens - precisely because this measuring device is NOT designed for the house power frequency of 50 Hz. However, if you now switch the light on and off, a high-frequency field in the microwave range is briefly generated with each switching operation, which is then displayed by the measuring device.
This is the same principle as with digital pulsing, the signal (here the current flow to the lamp) is switched on or off. And with every switching process, a much higher frequency field is generated here than would be assumed with the 50 Hz power supply...
Sources:
Ionizing radiation in mobile communications?
This post was created by the Option Community. Join in and post your message!
CONTRIBUTION TO OPTION GERMANY
