How do you deal with climate deniers?

Climate deniers cause the supporters of the scientific findings of the climate crisis headaches. Feelings of fear and helplessness, which are often triggered by the knowledge of the climate crisis, can be compensated by defense mechanisms such as denial. The despair is understandable on both sides - because the facts, statistics and graphics are unique.

The conversation between a climate denier and a climate supporter can get quite degenerate, as both interlocutors do not feel understood and the opinions can differ widely. Conversations about the climate can also be different: here are some tips from the “Psychotherapists for Future” website:

• No statistics! What scientists say is now universally known - who rolls over the person with facts and visions of the future, increases the likelihood that this goes on defense and no longer listens. A conversation should not be forced!
• To listen: A real conversation usually consists of listening from both sides. For example, the conversation can be opened with: "what is your perspective on the topic?" To show that there is interest and acceptance. In this way, something can be learned about the other person and become more profoundly involved in the conversation.
• Empathy and authenticity: contributing your own personal story / perspective on the topic makes the conversation more humane. Nobody is going to be an environmental protection expert today. It can also discuss initial failures or difficulties. Humor is definitely helpful!
• Common interest: who listens to his interlocutor, may find out what common interests or views exist in general - so the relevance of climate change can be discussed individually. For example, Person X likes to go on a beach vacation and snorkel - climate change threatens many coastal areas and harms beaches and marine life. Or could it be about the welfare of one's own children or the economic development of the region?
• solutions: who addresses the problem should also present solutions. These can even be adapted and suggested individually to the person.

According to the Psychologists / Psychotherapists for Future page, fact-based arguments can be counterproductive. If someone tries to persuade me to accept climate change, I will probably understand that as an attack and increasingly go for defenses. In order not to let the divisive opinions of the climate crisis degenerate, some of these conversation tips are certainly helpful.

Read more about the article on the Psychologists for Future website:

https://psychologistsforfuture.org/umgang-mit-leugnern-der-klimakrise/

Photo / Video: Shutterstock.